Category Archives: Rubbish

Time for a co-operative approach!


Hosier Lane is an important neighbourhood in the CBD. It has been widely promoted as a destination for tourists by all tiers of government and significant investment made by businesses, residents and government authorities. Recent media coverage has brought attention to the decline in safety and amenity in the lane ways. We want to work with Council on a strategy to address these concerns and development of a coordinated approach to securing the long-­term viability of the area for all. We hope to gain support for this initiative from all Mayoral candidates and their teams.

The specific issues of concern to our community of lane way users, the art community, residents, businesses, tourism, et al include:

1. General decline in behaviour

  • Threats, including needles and other hazards, verbal abuse aimed at residents and tenants trying to access premises.
  • Break-­ins, assaults, threats, damage to property.
  • Guests and employees being threatened.
  • Often police do not respond quickly and if they do they are unable to act unless they see a crime occurring.

2. Temporary campsite has negatively impacted the amenity and safety of the area

  • Increasing homelessness in the city has led to increased numbers seeking access to the services offered here – eg health, washing, social etc.
  • Needles, garbage and rodents are more prevalent.
  • Bins damaged, stolen and mis­‐used.

3. Decline in quality and relevance of artwork and graffiti

  • Artists not safe –regularly threatened, attacked and robbed.
  • Best and more notable artists are no longer interested in painting in Hosier Lane.
  • Tagging and vandalism has become the norm at expense of works that will be respected.

4. Aggression and threatening behaviour from some individuals and groups

  • Towards tour groups –school children exposed to dangerous and inappropriate behaviours.
  • Artists have been threatened and are reluctant to return.

Where to from here?

  1. Cameras (CCTV) should be installed as a priority
  2. Lighting is critical
    • Lighting should be prioritised and installed immediately.
  3. Waste management
    • Bin management procedure reviewed.
    • Compactors installed and maintained.
  4. Regular co-­ordinated patrols
    • Salvation Army, Police
    • Investigate potential ‘Lane way Warden’ program.
  5. As a last resort
    • Implement a complete buff of the lane way.
    • Implement graffiti removal policy where necessary.

Hosier and Rutledge Lanes Improvement Project Report


On 5 February 2013 Melbourne City Council resolved to implement a 12 month project plan in Hosier and Rutledge Lanes in order to address the anti-social behaviour taking place in the lane.

The plan was enacted to trial an alternative approach to the installation of CCTV. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) is the approach that has been used to inform the plan. The attached document is the final report for this initiative.

The steering committee was chaired by City of Melbourne and met from March 2013 – March 2014 to oversee the project. Members included City of Melbourne branches (Arts & Culture and Community Safety and Wellbeing), Hosier Inc, Salvation Army Street Teams, Youth Projects, RMIT School of Art and Victoria Police.

View the final report – Download the pdf (1.2Mb)

Tagged , , , , , , ,

Forum redevelopment approved

Following a media announcement last week featuring the Minister and the owner of the site, most who communicated with the Minister regarding the proposed hotel development in Hosier Lane will have received a letter or email from the Minister’s Dept that indicates it has been approved.

Despite the lack of cover letter, we assume these copies of a notification dated September 1st, are to be considered our formal notification of the approval by the Minister… despite being personally addressed to “Bill”.

There are certain conditions to the approval, none of which adequately address the core concerns we have about the way the building will interface with Hosier Lane and that impact on this busy pedestrian zone. In particular the loading and unloading arrangements, and the shadowing that will be imposed by such a large tower. Please be sure to read the document clearly and let us know of any other issues you see or concerns raised.

Within the letter is the note that any objections to the approval must be received within 21 days. Unfortunately (if you wish to object) the letters were distributed only after that deadline had passed so questions need to be asked about the process that has been followed. Please do so. Call or write to the department and ask those questions! We ask you to communicate with the group about your questions and any answers you receive.

What next? We are currently seeking advice about our options so please be in touch if you are concerned about the approved development and we will keep you posted via this page. Post on the page, comment, like and share your concerns about the proposal, and about the process followed!

In case you have not received this notice, like some in the group you can read ithere: L to app NOD 1.9.14.

The full notice that includes detailed information about restrictions and requirements regarding the Urban Art Strategy, Waste Management and Loading provisions required is available here: NOD signed 1.9.14.

Community concern for MTC / Forum Theatre development

S11353_Russell Street_Report_181213_PRINT-55

A community meeting was held last night (Tuesday 11th March) at Misty Bar which gave forum to the heritage objections that are available for all those interested in objecting to the proposed planning permit – 2013/009973 covering the Forum Theatre and the site immediately behind it. The following items were discussed to inform those who wish to proceed with submissions & objections. Members of Hosier Inc were present among the wider community.

Those of you who choose to submit an objection are urged to include as many of the points outlined below as you feel are of concern, but also include any additional personal, public or location-based objections that we all may have – just remember to use a heritage objection in our objection so that it is relative to the objection requested by the planning permit.

Lack of community consultation by the developers and the proposal in its current form fails to address a range of community concerns. The DA application documents (download the 11Mb pdf of the concept) demonstrate that the scheme up for approval is not to the benefit of anyone who currently works, lives or plays in the lane way. We’d even go further and say that the scheme is not beneficial to the developer – it has the potential to harm their brand, and may in fact under value the property by proposing a scheme which is clearly under cooked. In its current form the scheme fails to consider a number of key issues, particularly in respect of the Hosier Lane interface, community & history.

The following points are discussed in more detail below:

  1. The Heritage overlay that encompasses the area has a discretionary height limit of 40m, but the proposed development proposes to reach 106m.
    1. a) The proposed demolition of the historic Russell St theatre will remove the last remaining Robin Boyd structure in the CBD.
  2. This proposal will deliver sheer faces on all four sides, breaking the longstanding convention of ‘podium and tower’ style buildings and setting a very bad precedent for future developments.
  3. The traffic report within the proposal does not adequately explain how pedestrian & emergency services access and ingress will be managed in Hosier Lane, and proposes all loading for the hotel, commercial and residential activities will take place from a loading ‘dock’ adjacent to the new building in Hosier Lane.
  4. Hosier Lane has an internationally respected art culture — using the current lane way for marketing for the new hotel is not going to be sustainable and it is anticipated that the new hotel will impact adversely on the nature and vibrancy of the culture of the area.
  5. Combining the proposals for the purpose of side-lining the council is not acceptable.
  6. The proposed hotel development has the potential to change the amenity of the area and will influence the activities that will be possible in adjoining properties.
  7. The proposed development will significantly impact the surrounding heritage properties, vibration from plant, overwhelming visual impact and encroaching on airspace.
  8. The interface between the new building and Hosier Lane is not consistent with or sympathetic with the current conditions and use of the space.
  9. The space would be better suited to a development that addresses the real needs of the local area.
  10. What is this development creating as precedent for the future of Melbourne and are we selling our heritage out by allowing such ordinary purpose for this unique area
  11. The complete overshadowing of the Atrium will impact significantly on this ‘Winter Garden’ that is integral to the design of Fed Square.
  12. Talk to everyone if you want your opinion on this application to be heard.

1. Heritage Overlay

The heritage height limit which is discretionary for this zone is ; 40m, the proposed hotel building is 106m – no brainer.
– the postage stamp site has been pushed through the boundaries of the heritage limit. Nothing about this site matches or relates on an aesthetic level to the neighbourhood.

1.a Robin Boyd design

We have discovered that the Russell St Theatre, the site of the new building, is actually a Robin Boyd redesign (from an original church, so a major redesign). This makes it of great architectural significance, it would be the only Robin Boyd building left in the CBD.
Although we are unsure of the current condition of the interior, it is of significant importance and should at the very least warrant scientific investigation and potentially preservation. It is also of very real significance to the Melbourne community as the home of Australia’s first professional repertory theatre. This may be a reason NOT to demolish it and to use the building as a point of history for Boyd and his influence on other architects – notably Roy Grounds who is of particular significance to Melbourne.

  • We could ask the Planning Dept to request a full investigation of the site prior to considering the application to demolish.
  • Are there any actors ready to take the challenge of championing this cause who have worked in this site?

2. Proposal disrupts ‘podium and tower’ design conventions

This is a small boutique site with interfaces on all four sides that will be affected by all provisions in the scheme – In your objection, please try to relate this to the Hosier Lane interface. Development in Melbourne’s lane ways has been encouraged to utilise setbacks and a podium style approach to retain the unique character and scale that makes these places so important to the fabric of the city. This proposal will deliver sheer faces on all four sides, breaking that convention and setting a very bad precedent for future development to follow. The podium tower type does not lend itself structurally to the lane way interface and lacks human scale especially on the eastern boundary that faces Hosier Lane.

  • Tall sheer walls are juxtaposing all the current surfaces of the lane way and it is about what would happen in the future as to what should be accepted now – what would this zone look like if several buildings decided to do this type of proposal – it would totally remove the feeling and amenity of the lane way – this is important.
  • There are no set backs, so we will have a sheer wall ; what is this going to be like imposing upon a brick lane way facade and our lives?
  • Please also comment of your thoughts about the nature of the architecture itself. Is this design by a Sydney team ‘right’ in the context of this area?

3. Incomplete Traffic Report

The traffic report in its current form does not adequately explain how pedestrian access and ingress will be managed with the proposed loading dock having trucks ( of what size and load)? pulling up in the lane way to deliver to the new establishment.

  • No specification of vehicle types and what the number of vehicles will be expected to service the new proposed hotel block and no consideration of turning circles and flow on effects in Flinders Lane and Flinders Street due to additional heavy traffic entering and exiting the lane way.
  • The traffic report does not show how these trucks will enter or down load, nor does it confirm the current traffic volume that services the lane way – the existing businesses of The Living Room, Misty and Movida are not mentioned nor is their current schedule of deliveries or pick ups including ambulance 24/7 requirements in the case of the Living Room?
  • Vehicular traffic in Hosier Lane is already very restricted due to the considerable amount of foot traffic that uses the lane way at all hours. Approx 1000 pedestrians each day would be in danger if additional loading and delivery vehicles were imposed on the space. Due to the lack of footpaths and genuine attraction for sightseers, consideration should be made to making this a pedestrian zone… this is an avenue to explore with Council engineering.
  • Not all hotels have a lane way entrance at the back of their facility – hence, the loading dock could be supported from the front of the new facade on Russell Street and not use the Hosier Lane side of the property
  • The 5 car drop off area in Russell needs to be reconsidered for dual purpose loading zone.
  • If the weight of the trucks using the lane way for delivery is not listed, we cannot be sure that the bluestone blocks that currently make the cobblestones of the heritage lane way will not be dilapidated with the constant wear and tear from all of the new use of the lane way.

4. Adverse impact on the culture of the area

Hosier Lane has an internationally respected art culture — fundamentally the development proposal in its current form will adversely affect the social & organic processes developing in the precinct.

  • The art included in the proposal is commercial and privately driven. This type of installation bears little resemblance to the character of the lane way. The proposed streetscape clearly compromises the current street culture & fabric. The notoriety of this area with its current tourist trade & affiliated businesses will surely be adversely affected.
  • Using the current lane way for marketing for the new hotel is unlikely to be sustainable. It is likely that the new hotel will soon cause the lane way to change for the benefit of the new tenants.
  • The lane way may lose its organic nature, and therefore losing it’s street art following and consequently risking a huge tourism draw-card.

5. Tricky application combines two sites

The Forum is not being renovated, only maintained and we are expected to accept this as the pay off for the owner actually doing their civic duty as owners of a heritage building. Utilising the floor space to combine the proposals for the purpose of over reaching the council is not acceptable and the State Government need to have a survey done of the area so that they understand all the items that have not been addressed in the proposal — from waste management, delivery, culture and amenity not to mention the current social consciousness of the lane way and its recreational users.

  • The community benefit is a superficial restoration of the exterior of the Forum, and will pay a huge cost. The trade-off for very little is that the lane way will have to cope with an incredible change to what is currently accepted as being REAL.
  • All of the community want the lane way to be lively, active and safe. However, it needs to work for all involved. At present we are all owners and custodians of the place at this time and need to be involved with the process of transformation for any new purpose that the lane way is asked to be part of. The development proposes to ‘activate the lane way. The current numbers of visitors to the area really makes this point moot. Any additional visitors that the development brings will add nothing to the amenity of the area, but may actually detract.

6. Impact on live music scene

The proposed hotel development has the potential to change the amenity of the area and will influence the activities that will be possible in adjoining properties.

  • The architecture does not act with responsibility being built at the back of building where the base levels from the live music will cause intense vibration to the whole front surface. This again imposes on the already operational and accepted living standard in the lane way. It is anticipated that this may cause the live music of the Forum to cease (or be compromised) and the interior of the theatre to be used for a different purpose — closing one of the last real live music venues in the city.
  • The sound engineers report (as part of the development documentation) suggests that sounds from the Forum Theatre will exceed the maximum levels for the hotel unless special glass is specified as well as background sound masking. It is noted in the report that the noise impact testing was taken on January 29th 2014 and the testers were advised that the band playing was typical for operation of the Forum Theatre. The band playing that night were the ‘Chvrches’, a synth pop band with little to no base and synthesised drums. Hardly a typical band for sound testing. (see here It’s the base sounds that are the long-range sounds that cause issues as shown in the report. The hotel is +17 decibels over the maximum limit for base sounds on the exterior, a huge amount. It is our opinion that even if the construction manages to reduce the base sounds to the maximum level allowed it will still cause complaints from the hotel.

7. Plant room impact

The plant room in the proposed building will be on level 9 which is directly opposite all the buildings on Flinders Lane and will cause vibrational impact on the heritage surfaces of these buildings — no reference to this type of noise or vibration issues are given in the proposal, so it has not been thought about with reference to impact upon existing buildings. No consideration has been made for possible future developments on the adjoining property known as Cavendish House. Boundary walls include windows on all floors looking north. Consideration should be made to ensure these windows do not remove their rights to develop above the existing level in future.

8. Unsympathetic design

What is happening at ground level in the “cafe” zone is not available in the proposal in detail, so we will not know what is being planned until it is built — but it appears to be inconsistent with the existing use of the lane way. The few drawings that have been included indicate a misunderstanding of the profile of businesses that live & work in the lane way. We have a homeless medical centre that has been part of this lane way for over 10 years. It is of great concern to the community that this would be “homogenized” to accommodate a ‘cafe culture’ aspect to modify the community services provided. We cannot afford to compromise this important community service.

9. Address the real needs of the local area

While there is a real need for more hotel rooms in the CBD, there are 15 other hotels with planning permits in permission phase as this goes live — this hotel does not NEED to be built-in this lane way. This site could be used for a better purpose that adds to the area rather than imposing on it. There is opportunity to use this space to address the many issues that had plagued the area for years, such as waste management, providing space for artists to work and exhibit and educate visitors and young people etc. This is something that the community have requested for a while due to the poor waste management that is currently in place in this lane way.

  • There is no mention of a waste management plan for such a huge building in the lane way
  • No idea of what this building will provide in the order of tonnes of waste and how it will be collected and who will be collecting it — and when?
  • What sort of imposition on the community will this collection put on the neighbourhood and the council?

10. Precedent

What is this development creating as precedent for the future of Melbourne and are we selling our heritage out by allowing such ordinary purpose for this unique area — if there were several developments like this to occur in the lane way would it hold is unique organic feel or would it be lost to commercial plagiarism? There is an extreme duty of care in the hands of the planning department and this is not something to be taken lightly.

11. Impact of additional shading

Shadowing on Fed Square – this is distinct disregard for the current laws on shadowing of Fed Square and needs to be addressed in the height issue. In particular, the complete overshadowing of the Atrium will impact significantly on this ‘Winter Garden’ that is integral to the design of Fed Square.

12. Who to talk to

We recommend individuals approach councillors to encourage them to address individual concerns about this development application;

Councillor Ong – Planning
Lord Mayor – Robert Doyle
Councillor Wood – Environment
Councillor Foster – The people

All other objections can be personal, subjective or a segue to any of the above, but please mention Heritage overlay, Heritage height or Heritage sympathy and you are on the right path.

The opinions stated in the above outline are a reflection of the topics discussed at the meeting held last night. Thank you for coming to the meeting or being interested in Hosier & Rutledge Lanes & this community.

The Forum is up for redevelopment

We urge you to find out more about this development at a public meeting to be held 6.30pm at Misty this Tuesday night, the 11th of March. Please like and share to get the word out – come to the meeting and have a say.


Proposed development will impact on Hosier Lane

Owners of the Forum Theatre, Mariner Group have submitted another proposal for the redevelopment of the MTC site between Russell Street and Hosier Lane. The plans will see a 32-storey boutique hotel and office complex built behind the Forum on the derelict old MTC site. 


Artist’s impression, as published in The Sunday Age 22.12.13

You can read about it in this article in the Age today. This will obviously have a huge impact on Hosier and Rutledge Lanes, both during construction and (more significantly) when it is complete. At this early stage it’s difficult to proffer an informed opinion about the design. It has been developed with little or no consultation or conversation with those who actually know and understand the community in which it sits. 

On the surface it seems a fairly typical and uninspired developer approach to this important site. The application centres around this being essential to facilitate the much needed refurbishment of the Forum Theatre, which has (conveniently) been left to fall into disrepair. The application was filed with the Victorian Department of Planning on Friday and the decision about the proposal will ultimately rest with Planning Minister Matthew Guy.

Share your thoughts here. Hosier Inc would hope to be included in any future consultations.

Lighting proposal zig-zags up laneway

Hosier Rutledge Lanes Steering Committee (HRLSC) met on the 18th of September in the Carlton Room – it was a full house with many events and items discussed! One of those was the CoM proposal to install a new laneway lighting design. Ian Dryden – Senior Industrial Designer for the City of Melbourne presented a set of slides of illustrations depicting the proposed catenary light design.


As described by Ian in his presentation document (see link below):

The Hosier Lane catenary system is based on two parallel cables in close proximity to each wall, with an additional zig-zag down the centre. The zig-zag provides support for the system, introducing the possibility of using lighter weight ‘cable’ connections to buildings, in lieu of heavy brackets. The intention is to create an outdoor gallery lighting system, to complement and enhance the space.

The zig-zag of coloured leds down hosier lane introduces additional colour and visual interest to the space. Clusters of twin adjustable led spotlights accentuate artworks with medium beam, warm white (3000k) light. Discrete form and louvres combine to minimise the visual impact of the luminaire, and maximise the impact of the illuminated artworks.

Multi-function ‘theatre-bars’ would be integrated into the catenary system at both intersections of rutledge and hosier lanes. Adjacent power supplies to be provided to allow the bars to be used for supporting additional special purpose lighting, speakers, banners or temporary art installations. The intent is to enhance the flexibility of the space, and enable the implementation of gallery style exhibition openings or other events in the laneways.

The Rutledge Lane catenary system is designed as a minimised instance of the Hosier Lane system. The zigzag cabling incorporates the spot and linear lighting and fuses with the Hosier Lane system and the theatre-bars at the laneway intersections. In addition, linear led luminaires with a combination of wide and flood optics will wash the walls with warm white (3000k) light and provide quantitative lighting to suit AS/NZS1158 Category P8 requirements in both the horizontal and vertical planes.

What d’ya reckon? We’d be interested to hear your thoughts and feedback regarding this design.

Tagged , , , , ,

Is it a missed opportunity?

It’s not every day that a couple of lanes within a CBD get such massive exposure as has been evident of recent weeks. Following the courageous Rutledge Lane project entitled ‘Empty Nursery Blue’  by local artist Adrian Doyle the media has been abuzz with pics and stories about this modest space. Some love it, some hate it, but by and large, everyone who comes across it has an opinion or at least an exclamation. Its a good time to reflect on this project, and on the aims and hopes for the precinct generally.

This recent article by Hosier Inc chairman Luke McManus on Vandalog gives a pretty good insight into the word on the streets. CDH’s sentiments do make sense coming from an artist’s standpoint and context. However, the question needs to be asked – is this precinct still a graffiti zone, or has it evolved to become something completely different? Experimental art or dare I say it – a viable art gallery for street artists? Nursery for graffiti – ummm.

Is it still relevant to promote Hosier and Rutledge Lanes as graffiti lanes if one takes the illicit nature of graffiti seriously? Excursions of marker toting kids writing illicitly on walls as the teacher/s expound the wonders of the genre? Seriously – the idea of genuine graffiti in this precinct is dead. Time to move on. Even these taggers are able to restrain themselves when confronted by a Nolan or a Whitely at the NGV.  So why is it alright to cap serious artistic endeavour in a public, sanctioned art precinct? Why is it ok to cap a business’ facade who has paid an artist for their time and creativity? Why is it deemed acceptable to climb a fence and down-pipe to tag over an 80 year old resident’s lounge room window? What role does graffiti have in our precinct?  ‘Empty Nursery Blue’  was a blank canvas beyond one’s wildest dreams, but has it been squandered? Is it possible to activate and engage the art community in pursuit of a self-managed and iconic state? Not sure yet.

Residents of Hosier Lane are continually bemused at how often we hear ‘Hey – it’s legal to graf here!  Just look around  – I’m not doing anything different from anyone else!’ or ‘so and so said so!’ In fact, here’s the City of Melbourne’s list (from their website) of registered street art permit sites around Melbourne. The notion that this precinct is graffiti legal – we contend – is a self perpetuating myth. The more people say it, the more truth there is in it. So Hosier Inc suggest it’s time to call it for what it really is – an art space for street art ‘with the blessing of property owners.’

The lane way has definitely been embraced by a small but fearless crew – a bunch of youngsters turning up early, late, all hours to hover and reclaim this holy Rutledge outpost. This is not a new occurrence, just a mutation of a traditional meeting spot. It’s an act of expression in a way, and one which leaves no piece uncapped – no fence un-climbed and no expletive un-said. Look out for them, and say g’day… but don’t expect mastery beyond a sneer and a backchat and a lazy tag over a fresh work painstakingly created by an artist who’s only just crossing Russell Street. Thankfully many works are preserved in time by photographers. Check out the imagery of Hosier Rutledge over the past month by captured by Hosier Inc member Dean Sunshine.

Andy Mac must be wondering what cyclone hit his City Lights light boxes. Many of the adjacent businesses are miffed – and have a lot less faith in street art than that of Hosier Inc. However, with the burgeoning membership, new and supportive residents along with help from the City of Melbourne (because we don’t have the funds yet to do it ourselves) the many day to day problems will be addressed, such as the light boxes, and soon we hope. A swathe of new paint-ups will re-fresh again, but our hope is with greater longevity and a healthy discourse about what CBD lane ways can be.

Let’s not confuse the issues. ‘The City of Melbourne recognises the importance of street art in contributing to a vibrant urban culture.’ Naturally. Graffiti on the other hand, needs to be managed, just as the City of Melbourne’s Graffiti Management Plan outlines. This is not really the raison d’etre of Hosier Inc, but it serves as one contributing factor in our efforts to maintain some semblance of order in the lanes. We hope to encourage contributing artists with ongoing support – not just with wall space, but also with materials and equipment. It just takes a little time and discussion to create and sustain something amazing. And just a little cash. We’ll keep you posted.

As far as an outcome for residents and local business goes it’s early days. We’ve had an influx of new visitors to Rutledge Lane – of figures we can’t be sure – but significant is all we can say from a local’s observation. Increased traffic through the lane ways of Melbourne has been a goal for the City of Melbourne for some time – with the primary objective to increase the perception and reality of safe thoroughfare throughout the CBD. So from this, it would appear that Hosier and Rutledge Lanes are pulling their weight. We’ve had fewer reported cases of criminal offences, as reported by the police representative at the Hosier Rutledge Lanes Steering Committee (HRLSC).  Although the increased traffic due to the increasing street buzz would have helped to a degree, thanks must go in large part to the Salvation Army Youth Street Teams who have agreed to patrol the lanes late at night on the weekends. I should add that this service is not necessarily a permanent commitment but more a trial at the behest of the council and Hosier Inc (and in lieu of dedicated lane way personnel, think the likes of Andy Mac!)

City council approves higher rates for empty, derelict blocks

INVITATION to MTC stakeholders

To the owners, past users and potential developers of the old MTC site on Russell Street, Melbourne.

Screen shot 2013-05-01 at 4.50.53 PM

Join Hosier Inc for a chat about how we can help utilize the old MTC. We’d love to discuss opportunities for this amazing site and offer assistance if possible.

We live and work in the precinct, so we think we have an unrivalled perspective to share.

What will the future hold for this site?

The future could be in their hands

What does it mean to be Lord Mayor of one of the world’s most liveable cities? And how can we keep that‘liveable’ status – and the relaxed lifestyle we enjoy ­– in the face of pressures like a booming population, an upwards-shooting skyline, traffic congestion and crime?

As the Melbourne City Council elections loom, Sally Warhaft will host a robust meet-and-greet with the candidates for the mayoral robes, including incumbent Robert Doyle, Liberal candidates Gary Morgan and Gary Singer, and Keith Rankin, Alison Parkes, David Nolte, Joseph Toscano and Brian Shanahan.

They’ll share their big ideas for Melbourne’s future and take your questions on how they’ll tackle the challenges that lie ahead.

The Wheeler Centre, 176 Little Lonsdale Street
6:15PM – 7:15PM, Tuesday 16 October 2012

%d bloggers like this: